Topic summary
77%2 analyzed articles/videos1,196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Advertising results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 873 hits. Analysis detected 6,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,439 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,542 of 16,562 topics). This Drug Advertising is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Drug Advertising
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,439
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 15.5%15.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate