Topic summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Advertising results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 873 hits . Analysis detected 6,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,439 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,542 of 16,562 topics). This Drug Advertising is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Drug Advertising
Topic details
Total words: 4,439
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.5% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst