Topic summary
74% 21 analyzed articles/videos 4,076 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dodgers results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 3,445 hits . Analysis detected 24,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,135 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (7,068 of 16,092 topics). This Dodgers is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Dodgers
Topic details
Total words: 15,135
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.1% percentile 3.3% BS Score21 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 20.8% 20.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst