Topic summary
77% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Documentary Film results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 2,293 hits . Analysis detected 16,590 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,630 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (11,146 of 16,562 topics). This Documentary Film is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group. Documentary Film
Topic details
Total words: 14,630
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.7% 15.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst