BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Status Quo Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 446 faulty-reasoning hits from 196 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.4% and a BS Rank of 73% (5,914 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the article peer group.

It’s rare for anyone to donate a kidney, and most of the time, the organ goes to someone close to the donor, like a spouse, a sibling or a parent. 
Altruistic kidney donation  the kind Lane did  is when you give the organ to a complete stranger. 
That kind of gift is even rarer, so much so that lots of people question the motives of the donor. 
Lane herself went through a rigorous screening to become eligible for the procedure. 
Along the way, she learned the history of kidney donation and met others who’ve made the choice to give a kidney to someone they’d never know or meet. 
Again and again, she encountered the same idea: It’s not a question of why anyone would give away a kidney, it’s why wouldn’t you? 
Penny Lane joins us to talk about her film. 
We’re screening “Confessions of a Good Samaritan” in partnership with the Utah Film Center on Wednesday, March 11, at 7 p.m. 
Tickets are free but you’ll need to RSVP. 
You’ll find the details here. 
GUEST 
Penny Lane is a documentary filmmaker. 
She has produced eight feature documentaries, including “Confessions of a Good Samaritan.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.3%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias14.3%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 15.3%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic15.3%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect12.2%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 15.3%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias15.3%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error10.2%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 41.8%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias41.8%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect10.7%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 12.2%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias12.2%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.8%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority13.8%This article: 12.2%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma12.2%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 10.2%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon10.2%This article: 0.0%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 12.2%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question12.2%This article: 0.0%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 12.2%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof12.2%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.3%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal14.3%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 10.2%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity10.2%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

196 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.