Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos2,248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disarmament results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 3,072 hits. Analysis detected 11,880 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,659 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,051 of 15,689 topics). This Disarmament is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Disarmament
Topic ranking list

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 31.8%31.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 31.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos