Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,055 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Estrin results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 3,589 hits . Analysis detected 15,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,929 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,622 of 6,628 authors). This Daniel Estrin is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Daniel Estrin
Author details
Total words: 10,929
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 32.8% 32.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.5% 6.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 32.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst