Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anas Baba results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 1,350 hits. Analysis detected 8,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,418 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,558 of 6,628 authors). This Anas Baba is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Anas Baba
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
77%Anas Baba (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,418
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 10.9%10.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.1%11.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.8%10.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 24.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 13.3%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Author 10.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos