Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,912 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disability Rights results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 4,582 hits . Analysis detected 20,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,832 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,295 of 16,562 topics). This Disability Rights is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. Disability Rights
Topic details
Total words: 19,832
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles19.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst