Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Shapiro results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 4,857 hits. Analysis detected 21,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,315 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,578 of 6,603 authors). This Joseph Shapiro is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Joseph Shapiro
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
31%Joseph Shapiro (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 24,315
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles24.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate