Topic summary
⁠22%3 analyzed articles/videos2,448 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diabetes Management results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 518 hits. Analysis detected 5,113 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,262 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,785 of 16,309 topics). This Diabetes Management is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Diabetes Management
Topic details
Total words: 8,262
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos