Topic summary
⁠33%2 analyzed articles/videos2,236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Development Projects results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 986 hits. Analysis detected 3,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,708 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (15,070 of 16,562 topics). This Development Projects is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Development Projects
Topic details
Total words: 6,708
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos