Topic summary
66% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,441 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democracy Conflict And Governance results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 2,287 hits . Analysis detected 25,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,572 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,572 of 15,882 topics). This Democracy Conflict And Governance is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Democracy Conflict And Governance
Topic details
Total words: 26,572
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles26.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst