Topic summary
48% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Policy results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 1,709 hits . Analysis detected 25,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,967 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (12,931 of 16,092 topics). This Defense Policy is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Defense Policy
Topic details
Total words: 26,967
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles27K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst