Author summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Macarthur Bosack results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 810 hits . Analysis detected 5,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,595 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,834 of 6,171 authors). This Michael Macarthur Bosack is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. Michael Macarthur Bosack
Author details
Total words: 4,595
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.1% 12.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.3% 11.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst