Topic summary
⁠80%3 analyzed articles/videos3,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defamation Lawsuits results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 2,758 hits. Analysis detected 14,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,193 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,931 of 16,562 topics). This Defamation Lawsuits is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Defamation Lawsuits
Topic details
Total words: 11,193
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.4%19.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.6%24.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Horn Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos