Topic summary
29%4 analyzed articles/videos1,870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Death And Dying results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,257 hits. Analysis detected 4,434 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,536 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,991 of 22,683 topics). This Death And Dying is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Death And Dying

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.7%14.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate