Topic summary
29% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Death And Dying results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Indoctrination , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,257 hits . Analysis detected 4,434 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,536 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,991 of 22,683 topics). This Death And Dying is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Death And Dying
Topic details
Total words: 8,536
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst