Author summary
8% 2 analyzed articles/videos 819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maggie Mullen results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 352 hits . Analysis detected 1,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,810 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (8,720 of 8,876 authors). This Maggie Mullen is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Maggie Mullen
Author details
Total words: 7,810
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.8% percentile 0.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst