Topic summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dearborn results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 127 faulty-reasoning hits from 432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,110 of 16,562 topics). This Dearborn is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Dearborn
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 432
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.2% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles432 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos