Author summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Schulz results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 127 faulty-reasoning hits from 432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (1,540 of 6,628 authors). This Sara Schulz is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Sara Schulz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠77%Sara Schulz (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 432
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510076.8% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles432 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 7.2%7.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 1.9%1.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos