Topic summary
⁠56%3 analyzed articles/videos2,958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Customer Experience results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 2,492 hits. Analysis detected 14,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,721 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,029 of 16,562 topics). This Customer Experience is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Customer Experience
Topic details
Total words: 14,721
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos