Author summary
48% 2 analyzed articles/videos 590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexander Noll results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 593 hits . Analysis detected 3,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,274 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,383 of 6,171 authors). This Alexander Noll is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group. Alexander Noll
Author details
Total words: 3,274
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.6% percentile 4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.8% 14.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Author 18.1%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Bandwagon: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst