Nightmarish moment enormous COCKROACH scuttled up TV reporter's neck as she broadcast live to huge audience 54%

By Alexander Noll49%

7/15/2026, 7:07:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 841 faulty-reasoning hits from 376 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.5% and a BS Rank of 54% (9,574 of 20,516 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the article peer group.

A KTLA 5 news reporter managed to keep her composure while a massive cockroach crawled over her during a live broadcast in California. 
Menitoff's eyes visibly widened, indicating she could feel the insect crawling over her neck, chest and clothing. 
'She probably wasn't sure what it was, you just know there's something,' said fellow KTLA 5 reporter, Jessica Holmes. 
However, Menitoff's reporting remained untainted as she finished the segment. 
'She's just that much of a pro,' Holmes added. 
Multiple peers and thousands of comments on social media praised Menitoff's professionalism for staying relaxed as she powered through the broadcast. 
KTLA 5 reporter, Rachel Menitoff, was broadcasting live from a California neighborhood when a large flying cockroach invaded her shot 
Menitoff's eyes visibly widened indicating she could feel the insect crawling on her, but her reporting was untainted as she finished the segment 
Peers and social media comments praised Menitoff's professionalism for keeping her composure as she powered through the broadcast 
'I have to hand it to her, she was really calm,' said Eric Spillman, another KTLA reporter. 
'How did she not even flinch? 
on the other hand, would have thrown the microphone and screamed a bloodcurdling scream and run off into the street,' one person wrote on Facebook. 
The roach proceeded to jump onto her mic before flying out of the frame. 
'At the end I have to say, I'm so relieved that it jumped onto the mic. 
Because it looked like it was going to crawl into her clothing,' one of the anchors pointed out. 
The reporters unanimously agreed that there was 'no way' they would be able to keep their cool if put into the same scenario. 
The studio shared an off-air behind-the-scenes clip showing Menitoff putting down her microphone before swiping her skin and shaking herself off after the broadcast was finished. 
Menitoff's fellow KTLA reporters suspected that the recent weather was to blame for a general increase in bugs in the area. 
The reporters discussed experiencing an influx of ants and flies in their homes, which they attributed to California's recent extreme heat. 
'You open your door or your window and they're coming in,' they said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.6%Alexander Noll: 2.6%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 23.9%Alexander Noll: 9.9%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic23.9%This article: 5.6%Alexander Noll: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.6%This article: 3.5%Alexander Noll: 1.2%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 5.6%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Alexander Noll: 1.1%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 1.6%Alexander Noll: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias1.6%This article: 17.0%Alexander Noll: 14.8%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias17.0%This article: 6.6%Alexander Noll: 1.8%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 1.8%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 1.6%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Alexander Noll: 5.8%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect15.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 2.7%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.6%Alexander Noll: 7.9%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization9.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 16.5%Alexander Noll: 4.8%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon16.5%This article: 20.2%Alexander Noll: 7.3%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion20.2%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.2%Alexander Noll: 3.8%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.2%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 26.1%Alexander Noll: 18.1%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal26.1%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.1%Alexander Noll: 2.6%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.1%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.6%Alexander Noll: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity1.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 19.1%Alexander Noll: 3.4%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote19.1%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 1.7%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 17.6%Alexander Noll: 5.5%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice17.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Noll: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

376 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers12%attributed speech331writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageJessica Holmes • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageJessica Holmes • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageEric Spillman • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jessica Holmes

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words62% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Unattributed Quote+51.8 ptsWriter: 16.0%Jessica Holmes: 67.9%67.9%Biased Writer Voice-19.9 ptsWriter: 19.9%Jessica Holmes: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.