Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Winkie results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 2,708 hits . Analysis detected 17,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,974 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,380 of 6,279 authors). This Luke Winkie is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Luke Winkie
Author details
Total words: 17,974
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles18K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.1% 15.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst