Topic summary
⁠66%4 analyzed articles/videos242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Currency Markets results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 3,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,832 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,769 of 16,562 topics). This Currency Markets is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Currency Markets
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
4.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos