Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erica Yokoyama results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 2,724 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,376 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,046 of 6,362 authors). This Erica Yokoyama is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Erica Yokoyama
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
53%Erica Yokoyama (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,376
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate