Topic summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos6,642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cultural Activities results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 3,007 hits. Analysis detected 25,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,585 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (10,913 of 15,737 topics). This Cultural Activities is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Cultural Activities

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles28.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate