Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,644 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Larry Bleiberg results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 1,647 hits. Analysis detected 7,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,907 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 91% (632 of 6,604 authors). This Larry Bleiberg is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Larry Bleiberg
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
91%Larry Bleiberg (selected)8%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,907
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510090.4% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 31.1%31.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 30.6%30.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 33.6%33.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.5%9.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 33.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Author 31.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 30.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos