Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,997 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Hall results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 1,795 hits . Analysis detected 12,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,192 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,549 of 6,348 authors). This Laura Hall is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Laura Hall
Author details
Total words: 13,192
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.6% 13.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst