Topic summary
⁠63%3 analyzed articles/videos1,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Culinary Scene results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 1,631 hits. Analysis detected 8,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,059 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,155 of 16,562 topics). This Culinary Scene is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Culinary Scene
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,059
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos