Topic summary
8% 9 analyzed articles/videos 8,250 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Culinary Arts results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 2,448 hits . Analysis detected 15,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,297 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (15,056 of 15,447 topics). This Culinary Arts is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Culinary Arts
Topic details
Total words: 33,297
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score9 analyzed articles33.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst