Topic summary
⁠50%3 analyzed articles/videos977 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Culinary results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 974 hits. Analysis detected 6,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,419 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,559 of 15,755 topics). This Culinary is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Culinary
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,419
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.6%12.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos