Topic summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cross Border Relations results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,526 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,531 of 16,562 topics). This Cross Border Relations is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Cross Border Relations
Topic details
Total words: 2,526
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos