Topic summary
27% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Criminal Charges results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,025 hits . Analysis detected 5,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,645 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,513 of 16,562 topics). This Criminal Charges is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Criminal Charges
Topic details
Total words: 7,645
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst