Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Criminal Case results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 577 hits. Analysis detected 2,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,564 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,008 of 16,562 topics). This Criminal Case is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Criminal Case
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,564
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.5%22.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.4%15.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos