Topic summary
â 43% 4 analyzed articles/videos 7,251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cricket results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 1,592 hits . Analysis detected 18,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,709 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of â 12% (14,464 of 16,356 topics). This Cricket is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Cricket
Topic details
Total words: 23,709
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles23.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst