Author summary
ā 77% 1 analyzed article/video 940 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Thorsen results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 332 hits . Analysis detected 2,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ā 63% (2,404 of 6,354 authors). This Nina Thorsen is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Nina Thorsen
Author details
Total words: 2,820
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.2% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Productā¦ Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst