KQED61%

Oakland Coliseum Welcomes Bay Area Fans for Major League Cricket Final 56%

By Nina Thorsen77%

7/18/2026, 11:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 183 hits. Analysis detected 1,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 940 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.4% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,722 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the article peer group.

American cricketer Sanjay Krishnamurthi recalled watching a baseball game at the Oakland Coliseum a few years back, when the Athletics were still playing there. 
“And I remember thinking, it would be really cool if cricket could be like this someday,” the 23-year-old San José State University student said. 
“It happened sooner than expected.” 
Krishnamurthi plays for the San Francisco Unicorns, a Major League Cricket franchise that has existed since 2023. 
For the first two seasons, with no “home field” available, the team had to play all of its games outside California. 
After the A’s left for West Sacramento, the Unicorns moved to the Coliseum  injecting new life into a venue hurting for major or professional sports teams, and seen in many ways as a symbol for Oakland’s trials and transformations. 
Oakland approved new terms for the $125 million sale of its stake in the Coliseum on Monday. 
Although plans are still uncertain, the new owners, the Oakland Acquisition Company, an affiliate of the African American Sports and Entertainment Group, have indicated they want the space to become a destination for musical artists. 
For now, the massive edifice at 7000 Coliseum Way is still functioning as the home of the Oakland Roots soccer team for the rest of this season and as the site for the national playoffs for the MLC. 
The final game on Saturday will pit the Los Angeles Knight Riders against the Washington Freedom. 
Over the past two seasons, while the Unicorns have been at the Coliseum, Krishnamurthi has invited a lot of his buddies who didn’t grow up watching the game to give it a try. 
“Cricket sells itself,” he said. 
“Once people see and understand the game in person, it brings fans in.” 
This version of cricket, which is called T-20, is not the one many of us are vaguely familiar with from British novels and Masterpiece Theater. 
The games take about three hours, not three days, and the players are not wearing baggy white flannels but brightly colored uniforms  orange for the Unicorns, purple for the Knight Riders  with logos splashed across the front. 
It’s fast-paced and high-scoring  if you’re annoyed by a soccer match that may end in a 0-0 tie, check out the box score of Thursday’s game, where the Washington Freedom spoiled the Unicorns’ hopes for the championship  238/6 to 231/6. 
“In cricket, you can score 360 degrees. 
You can score behind yourself,” Liam Plunkett, part of the broadcast team for Major League Cricket, said on Sunday. 
“You don’t run the bases, you run back and forth. 
And if you do hit the equivalent of a home run  a six  you stay batting. 
“If you’ve got a batsman who’s hot on that day, he stays there and keeps batting,” he said. 
“Sometimes you get guys who hit the equivalent of 15 home runs in one game.” 
Plunkett played for the Unicorns last year, but at age 41, decided it was time to retire, although he did sign a limited contract to play baseball for the Oakland Ballers for a couple of games on cricket off-days. 
That gives him some room to compare and contrast the two games. 
The MLC season is short  just one month separates the first of 34 games from the championship this year. 
Unicorns CEO David White said cricket watchers are used to that and follow their favorite players through various leagues around the world. 
“Even the most avid cricket fan is very impressed when they get to an MLC match and see the quality of players we have,” he said. 
“Our team alone has five or six players who’ve just come in from the Indian Premier League, stars from all over the world, Pakistan, India, Australia, South Africa, you name it.” 
Although the Unicorns are branded as “San Francisco,” a lot of the South Asian American fanbase lives in the South Bay, and Oakland is just as convenient for them. 
The unusually spacious dimensions of the Coliseum’s playing field, designed to accommodate both football and baseball, make it work for cricket, too. 
“We checked every sports field available, and this is the only one [in the United States] with the dimensions big enough to play cricket,” MLC Tournament Director Justin Geale said. 
Other than the fields that were designed especially for cricket, of course, including the new home of the Los Angeles Knight Riders in Pomona. 
That field will also be used in 2028 when cricket returns to the Olympics after a 128-year absence. 
The Unicorns intend to build their own permanent facility somewhere in the Bay Area. 
They spent a few years negotiating with Santa Clara County for a site on the fairgrounds, but that plan has fallen through. 
White said the team has some good leads, but nothing firm yet. 
He hopes to return to the Coliseum for 2027, but the sale on Monday makes that uncertain. 
Krishamurthi and Plunkett said they won’t ever forget their time in Oakland, and Geale said he got goosebumps just stepping onto the field. 
“You know, I watched the film Moneyball 100 times,” Geale said. 
“The Oakland Raiders would play NFL football right here. 
For me to be able to walk out here, a kid from Australia who never thought he’d be in America, is amazing.” 
White said he expects Saturday’s final will have the largest crowd in MLC’s brief history, perhaps in excess of 10,000 attendees. 
He said the team is planning live South Asian music, fireworks and even a version of one of the Coliseum’s greatest traditions  tailgating. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Nina Thorsen: 0.9%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic2.8%This article: 2.7%Nina Thorsen: 0.9%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic2.7%This article: 0.5%Nina Thorsen: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.5%This article: 6.0%Nina Thorsen: 5.6%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias6.0%This article: 8.4%Nina Thorsen: 10.1%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect8.4%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Nina Thorsen: 0.8%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect2.3%This article: 9.4%Nina Thorsen: 6.7%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Nina Thorsen: 2.3%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias6.9%This article: 2.3%Nina Thorsen: 4.4%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Nina Thorsen: 3.7%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Nina Thorsen: 3.1%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Nina Thorsen: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.3%Nina Thorsen: 1.3%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority1.3%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.5%Nina Thorsen: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.5%This article: 16.7%Nina Thorsen: 9.7%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization16.7%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 19.5%Nina Thorsen: 11.8%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion19.5%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.3%Nina Thorsen: 0.8%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.3%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.1%Nina Thorsen: 3.1%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal6.1%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.3%Nina Thorsen: 1.8%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.3%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.2%Nina Thorsen: 1.7%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote5.2%This article: 3.7%Nina Thorsen: 1.2%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection3.7%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 1.4%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 1.4%Nina Thorsen: 0.5%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination1.4%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Thorsen: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Nina Thorsen: 5.0%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.3%

940 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers38%attributed speech581writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageSanjay Krishnamurthi • 24 words • 100.0% coverageSanjay Krishnamurthi • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageSanjay Krishnamurthi • 5 words • 100.0% coverageSanjay Krishnamurthi • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageLiam Plunkett • 7 words • 100.0% coverageLiam Plunkett • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLiam Plunkett • 10 words • 100.0% coverageLiam Plunkett • 18 words • 100.0% coverageLiam Plunkett • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLiam Plunkett • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDavid White • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDavid White • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDavid White • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Geale • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDavid White • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDavid White • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Geale • 11 words • 100.0% coverageJustin Geale • 9 words • 100.0% coverageJustin Geale • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDavid White • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDavid White • 24 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

David White

100%flagged-word coverage
153 attributed words43% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +8.5 ptsWriter: 7.2%David White: 15.7%15.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.