Author summary
â 41% 1 analyzed article/video 1,030 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anne Marks results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 290 hits . Analysis detected 2,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 26% (4,935 of 6,628 authors). This Anne Marks is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group. Anne Marks
Author details
Total words: 4,120
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Product⊠Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst