Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Court Appearance results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,081 hits. Analysis detected 4,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,726 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,660 of 16,562 topics). This Court Appearance is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Court Appearance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,726
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.7%16.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.9%22.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos