Topic summary
48% 15 analyzed articles/videos 6,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Strategy results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 2,553 hits . Analysis detected 27,962 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,204 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (12,752 of 15,765 topics). This Corporate Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group. Corporate Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 30,204
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score15 analyzed articles30.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst