Topic summary
⁠67%3 analyzed articles/videos2,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Litigation results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 843 hits. Analysis detected 6,694 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,928 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,856 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Litigation is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Corporate Litigation
Topic details
Total words: 6,928
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.5%8.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos