BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Bandwagon, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 268 hits. Analysis detected 969 faulty-reasoning hits from 692 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Happy Tuesday! 
Here’s your Tuesday Tech Drop, the past week’s top stories from the intersection of technology and politics. 
DOGE deposition videos released 
To paraphrase the Rev. 
Martin Luther King Jr.: Now is the time for justice to roll down like water and righteousness like a mighty (YouTube) stream. 
On Monday, a federal judge permitted the release of deposition videos, footage that has garnered widespread mockery for two former employees of President Donald Trump’s dubiously named Department of Government Efficiency. 
Nathan Cavanaugh and Justin Fox, who are both white men, have been dragged over the videos, which show them stumbling while responding to lawyers’ questions about diversity initiatives and cuts they made to federal programs while at DOGE. 
The depositions were part of a lawsuit over cuts made to the National Endowment for the Humanities. 
U.S. 
District Judge Colleen McMahon said the threat of further online harassment of the men didn’t justify withholding the videos. 
The ruling reverses her previous decision to order the videos be taken offline after the Trump administration said, in an emergency filing, that the men suffered harassment. 
“Here, the testimony in the videos concerns the conduct of public officials acting in their official capacities  a context in which the public interest in transparency and accountability is at its apex,” she wrote in her ruling. 
Warren seeks answers on Anthropic 
Sen. 
Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., is questioning the Defense Department’s choice to effectively blacklist Anthropic. 
On Monday, Warren sent a formal letter demanding answers on the department’s move to label the artificial intelligence company a supply chain risk after the company’s executives refused to weaken rules forbidding their technology from being used to conduct mass surveillance stateside or to power autonomous weapons. 
Data center dangers 
New research out of Arizona State University offered compelling evidence that the massive heat output from data centers can warm their surrounding communities, fueling concerns over these centers’ human and environmental impacts. 
Musk takes an L in court 
A jury in San Francisco has concluded that Elon Musk defrauded Twitter investors when he deliberately made misleading statements about the number of bots on the platform amid his efforts to purchase it. 
As Courthouse News Service reported: 
Investors, including lead plaintiffs Steve Garrett, Nancy Price, John Garrett and Brian Belgrave, sued Musk in October 2022 over claims they suffered major losses when Musk deliberately made misleading statements about the presence of spam bot accounts on Twitter to drive down the company’s stock, in hopes of backing out of the acquisition deal or renegotiating more favorably for himself. 
Musk’s attorneys said they intend to appeal the verdict, which could result in the plaintiffs being awarded more than $2 billion. 
AOC isn’t buying the spin 
Rep. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-Calif., warned that a move by prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket to prevent insider trading is merely “a fig leaf to deflect criticism from criticism.” 
Her critique comes amid growing outrage over suspicious bets that people have cashed in on the prediction markets, which essentially are glorified online gambling platforms. 
Warner raises concerns about TikTok fee 
Sen. 
Mark Warner, D-Va., is demanding answers from the Treasury about a mysterious $10 billion fee that TikTok investors have reportedly agreed to pay the federal government  to be used for who knows what  after Trump helped steer the company’s U.S. operations toward an ownership group led by one of his political allies. 
Trump’s umpteenth AI deregulation attempt 
The Trump administration’s new AI “framework” released last week looks like yet another effort to serve the president’s Big Tech benefactors by targeting state-level regulation of AI companies. 
AI companies look to influence the midterms 
A new story in The Wall Street Journal underscores how AI companies are trying to wield their influence in this year’s midterms. 
The report shines light on the time and money that some companies are dedicating to the race for the seat being vacated by Rep. 
Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. 
The race involves New York state Rep. 
Alex Bores, a former Palantir employee who has faced criticism while trying to portray himself as a sensible critic of AI companies. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 18.2%MS NOW: 7.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.9%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 5.1%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 1.3%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.9%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.7%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 36.0%Ja'han Jones: 34.4%MS NOW: 15.4%Framing Effect36.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 1.3%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 1.1%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.8%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 2.4%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 36.3%MS NOW: 19.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 1.1%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 3.8%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.5%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 7.5%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 8.6%MS NOW: 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Ja'han Jones: 1.3%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect6.8%This article: 6.1%Ja'han Jones: 4.2%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 2.5%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 1.1%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.7%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Ja'han Jones: 9.2%MS NOW: 4.7%Ad Hominem7.9%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 2.4%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.2%Ja'han Jones: 7.2%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority3.2%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 2.0%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 2.7%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 15.6%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 2.2%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 8.1%Ja'han Jones: 1.1%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon8.1%This article: 4.5%Ja'han Jones: 18.0%MS NOW: 9.8%Appeal to Emotion4.5%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 4.7%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 3.3%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 1.5%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 2.7%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 2.7%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 2.8%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 6.4%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 2.1%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 1.6%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 38.7%Ja'han Jones: 31.9%MS NOW: 14.2%Biased Writer Voice38.7%This article: 4.6%Ja'han Jones: 1.6%MS NOW: 2.1%Indoctrination4.6%This article: 24.1%Ja'han Jones: 20.4%MS NOW: 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias24.1%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 1.8%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ja'han Jones: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

692 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers21%attributed speech548writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageColleen McMahon • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageColleen McMahon • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageCourthouse News Service • 60 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words19% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-48.9 ptsWriter: 48.9%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-30.5 ptsWriter: 30.5%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.