Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Leadership results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 3,049 hits . Analysis detected 22,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,600 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (12,393 of 15,361 topics). This Corporate Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Corporate Leadership
Topic details
Total words: 25,600
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst