Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jenna Benchetrit results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 580 hits. Analysis detected 2,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,850 of 6,219 authors). This Jenna Benchetrit is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Jenna Benchetrit
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
39%Jenna Benchetrit (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,872
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510038.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos