Topic summary
78% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Investment results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,973 hits . Analysis detected 14,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,801 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,448 of 16,558 topics). This Corporate Investment is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Corporate Investment
Topic details
Total words: 12,801
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst