Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Brant Bingamon results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 270 hits . Analysis detected 3,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,027 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,227 authors). This Brant Bingamon is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Brant Bingamon
Author details
Total words: 3,027
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.1% Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst