Topic summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Trust results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,701 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,984 of 16,562 topics). This Consumer Trust is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Consumer Trust
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,701
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos