Poll: Will you stop buying LG monitors after this week's adware scandal? 54%

By Sean Endicott43%

7/25/2026, 6:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 933 faulty-reasoning hits from 567 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52% and a BS Rank of 54% (10,243 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the article peer group.

LG found itself in hot water after its monitors were spotted automatically installing adware onto PCs . 
Using certain LG monitors would result in a monitor app being installed silently. 
That app would then show pop-up ads for McAfee. 
Backlash against LG was so strong that Microsoft had to step in. 
While it's quite common to see McAfee preinstalled on a PC or bundled with other software, LG took things further. 
We’ve connected with the team at LG and as an immediate next step, they have agreed to disable the McAfee pop-up from their app. 
We appreciate LG working with us toward a shared goal of a better experience for our mutual customers. 
We will keep improving here with our ecosystem partners. 
Windows chief Pavan Davuluri 
The situation was placed in the spotlight because of an investigation by Gamers Nexus . 
That outlet did an excellent job breaking down the situation. 
The title of their video, "DO NOT BUY: LG’s Spyware TVs, Monitors, and Wiretapping Concerns," made me curious if people will stop buying LG monitors. 
I've seen outrage pointed at LG across the web, but will that lead to an actual boycott or just complaints on social media? 
People may be upset by the McAfee ads LG forced onto PCs, but will the outrage be enough to shift buying habits? 
Take a look at this quick roundup of LG monitor reviews from our sibling sites: 
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (T3): LG UltraGear 45GX950 review: The Rolls-Royce of gaming monitors 
⭐⭐⭐⭐½ (Tom's Guide): I just tested this 45-inch OLED gaming monitor  and it's so good it could be your next TV 
⭐⭐⭐⭐½ (Tom's Hardware): LG UltraGear 52G930B 52-inch 5K gaming monitor review: Extreme in every respect 
⭐⭐⭐⭐ (TechRadar): LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED review: This is the 4K OLED monitor of my dreams 
That's a lot of stars to overlook. 
I understand people's concerns about LG installing an app without notification then showing ads on PCs. 
I just doubt it will change people's buying habits. 
I predict a chorus of "I can turn the ads off" from those who choose to stick with LG monitors. 
And honestly, I don't blame them. 
If you've had a monitor work well for years and are looking for a new one, it makes sense to stick with what you know works. 
Others will claim that the problem is fixed since Microsoft stepped in and LG stopped pushing McAfee. 
The flip side of all this is that as good as LG monitors are, they have to compete with the best computer monitors from other companies. 
Competition is fierce in the monitor segment, and it won't take much to sway some customers to look at a different brand. 
LG is often one of the first companies to make monitors with certain specs. 
I've covered loads of UltraGear monitors that are the first in one category or another. 
But the reality is that many monitor companies buy components from the same sources. 
Heck, quite a few get their displays from LG. 
After any LG monitor sits alone as a unique combination of refresh rate, size, or curvature for a while, other companies catch up. 
Does LG's adware move cross a line for you, or is it a non-issue now that the pop-ups are gone? 
Vote in our poll and sound off in the comments below. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 3.2%Windows Central: 4.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.4%Windows Central: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Sean Endicott: 3.1%Windows Central: 4.6%Availability Heuristic12.2%This article: 3.5%Sean Endicott: 0.6%Windows Central: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.5%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.2%Windows Central: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Sean Endicott: 2.7%Windows Central: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias3.5%This article: 8.5%Sean Endicott: 5.5%Windows Central: 5.0%Framing Effect8.5%This article: 4.6%Sean Endicott: 1.6%Windows Central: 1.3%Loss Aversion4.6%This article: 10.1%Sean Endicott: 1.6%Windows Central: 0.9%Status Quo Bias10.1%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.3%Windows Central: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Sean Endicott: 6.7%Windows Central: 8.0%Optimism Bias4.8%This article: 1.6%Sean Endicott: 1.3%Windows Central: 3.0%Pessimism Bias1.6%This article: 12.9%Sean Endicott: 7.2%Windows Central: 8.6%Negativity Bias12.9%This article: 3.9%Sean Endicott: 1.7%Windows Central: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.6%Windows Central: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.2%Windows Central: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.9%Windows Central: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.3%Sean Endicott: 3.3%Windows Central: 4.1%Halo Effect11.3%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Sean Endicott: 1.3%Windows Central: 2.2%Recency Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.3%Windows Central: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.3%Windows Central: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.1%Sean Endicott: 2.5%Windows Central: 3.7%Appeal to Authority7.1%This article: 7.9%Sean Endicott: 2.7%Windows Central: 1.7%False Dilemma7.9%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 1.0%Windows Central: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.0%Sean Endicott: 6.7%Windows Central: 8.5%Hasty Generalization16.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.1%Sean Endicott: 0.6%Windows Central: 1.1%Bandwagon4.1%This article: 7.4%Sean Endicott: 1.9%Windows Central: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion7.4%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.9%Windows Central: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.1%Sean Endicott: 1.7%Windows Central: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.1%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.1%Sean Endicott: 0.4%Windows Central: 0.5%Burden of Proof2.1%This article: 4.6%Sean Endicott: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.1%Appeal to Nature4.6%This article: 2.5%Sean Endicott: 0.3%Windows Central: 0.2%Composition/Division2.5%This article: 10.2%Sean Endicott: 3.7%Windows Central: 4.0%Anecdotal10.2%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.9%Sean Endicott: 2.8%Windows Central: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.9%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.5%Windows Central: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.2%Sean Endicott: 0.4%Windows Central: 0.2%Personal Incredulity1.2%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 1.9%Windows Central: 3.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.4%Sean Endicott: 0.9%Windows Central: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection4.4%This article: 11.1%Sean Endicott: 13.5%Windows Central: 13.9%Biased Writer Voice11.1%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.8%Windows Central: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Endicott: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Sean Endicott: 7.1%Windows Central: 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.6%

567 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.