Topic summary
74%9 analyzed articles/videos8,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Colorado River results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 4,440 hits. Analysis detected 27,113 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,743 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,097 of 16,559 topics). This Colorado River is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles31.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.0%14.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate