Topic summary
89% 17 analyzed articles/videos 8,796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Football results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 4,284 hits . Analysis detected 41,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,539 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (9,750 of 15,342 topics). This College Football is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. College Football
Topic details
Total words: 32,539
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score17 analyzed articles32.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst